Container Handler Vs Reach Stacker: Key Differences Explained

Choosing the right equipment for container handling can make a big difference in your operations. Reach stackers and container handlers are both essential, but how do they compare? In this article, we will dive into the key differences between these two machines, helping you decide which one best suits your business needs.

Understanding the Basics of a Container Handler and a Reach Stacker

Definition of a Container Handler

A container handler is a type of lift truck designed specifically for container handling, often seen in ports, distribution centers, or other areas where containers need to be moved. These machines are built to lift and move containers efficiently, but they are limited to working within a single row at a time. The container handler is robust and well-suited to environments where containers are stacked vertically but not horizontally.

Definition of a Reach Stacker

A reach stacker, on the other hand, is designed to stack containers in multiple rows and is ideal for environments where storage density is crucial. Reach stackers are versatile, able to lift containers to greater heights and move them both vertically and horizontally. Their reach capability allows them to stack containers in a more compact space, often up to three or four rows deep.

Similarities Between the Two

While both machines are used for handling containers, they share a few similarities. They are both heavy-duty forklifts with hydraulic lifts, designed to transport containers from one location to another. Their primary function is to ensure that containers are stored efficiently, loaded, and unloaded.

Key Differences Between Container Handlers and Reach Stackers

Storage Capacity and Density

One of the key differences between container handlers and reach stackers is their storage capacity. Container handlers are more suitable for environments where containers are stacked high but not deep, typically allowing for stacking of up to 4 containers in height, but only one row deep.

On the other hand, reach stackers are ideal for stacking in multiple rows, increasing the storage density. For example, reach stackers can stack containers 4 high in the third row and 5 in the first. This capability makes reach stackers a better choice when storage space is limited and when the goal is to maximize the number of containers per square meter.

Selectivity and Operational Efficiency

Selectivity refers to how many containers need to be moved in order to access a specific container. The higher the selectivity, the more time it takes to access a container, as containers must be moved and then restacked.

Container handlers offer greater selectivity because they handle one row of containers at a time. This makes them a better option for operations that prioritize speed and efficiency in handling containers that need quick access. Reach stackers, while capable of stacking containers deeper, often require moving multiple containers to access a specific one, leading to increased handling time.

Manoeuvrability in Tight Spaces

Container handlers typically operate in narrower aisles and are more suited for environments where space is at a premium. In contrast, reach stackers, though more capable in terms of stacking height and row depth, require wider aisles, especially when used for heavier containers or stacking in multiple rows.

This difference in manoeuvrability can significantly impact the design and layout of a facility. Reach stackers need wider aisles to operate effectively, which could be a limitation in facilities with restricted space.

Lifting Capacity and Load Centre Differences

Container Handler Lifting Capabilities

Container handlers are designed to lift containers with greater lifting capacity at a shorter load center. This makes them a preferred option for environments where heavy containers need to be moved vertically without the need to reach out over multiple rows. Container handlers typically operate at a 1.6-meter load center, providing more stability and capacity for lifting heavy loads in a single row.

Reach Stacker Lifting Capabilities

Reach stackers, however, face challenges when lifting containers at greater heights or stacking them in multiple rows. Their lifting capacity is often reduced when handling containers in the second or third row, especially when the load center increases beyond the recommended 3.85 meters. To address this, reach stackers are designed to work at a 4.25-meter load center for better efficiency in stacking, though this comes at the expense of reduced lifting capacity.

Applications and Best Use Cases for Each Machine

Ideal Situations for a Container Handler

Container handlers are best suited for operations that require quick access to containers, such as ports or warehouses where containers are stacked one row deep. They are also ideal when handling heavier containers or when speed is a critical factor.

Ideal Situations for a Reach Stacker

Reach stackers, on the other hand, excel in environments where maximizing storage density is key. They are better for handling containers in multiple rows and are typically used in terminals or distribution centers with limited space. When the goal is to stack containers more efficiently and save space, a reach stacker is the superior choice.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Between the Two

To make the best choice between a container handler and a reach stacker, consider factors such as:

• The amount of space available for stacking containers.

• The need for quick access to containers versus maximizing storage.

• Load capacities and aisle width constraints.

• The speed and selectivity required in your operations.

Cost-Effectiveness and Return on Investment (ROI)

Container Handler Cost Analysis

Container handlers are typically less expensive to purchase and maintain compared to reach stackers. Their ability to stack containers in a single row makes them a good choice for operations where speed and efficiency are prioritized. However, their lack of storage density means you may need more space to handle the same number of containers.

Reach Stacker Cost Analysis

Reach stackers often come with a higher upfront cost due to their versatility and stacking capabilities. However, their ability to stack containers in multiple rows and maximize storage density can lead to long-term savings in terms of space and the number of containers that can be handled per square meter.

Long-Term Considerations for Both Machines

While the initial investment for a reach stacker may be higher, its ability to increase storage capacity and streamline operations could offer a better return on investment in the long run. Conversely, container handlers may be a more cost-effective solution for businesses that prioritize speed and minimal container handling time.

Conclusion

Choosing between a container handler and a reach stacker depends on your specific needs. If speed and quick access to containers are your priorities, a container handler is ideal. However, if maximizing storage space and container density is more important, a reach stacker offers greater value. Evaluating lifting capacity, storage density, and manoeuvrability will help you make the right choice for your operations. By carefully considering each machine's advantages and challenges, you can enhance efficiency, save costs, and improve throughput. TONA's reach stacker offers unparalleled storage density and efficiency, making it an excellent choice for businesses aiming to optimize space while maintaining high throughput.

FAQ

Q: What is a reach stacker used for?

A: A reach stacker is used for stacking containers in multiple rows, maximizing storage density. It allows for high lifting capacity and can handle containers with greater reach, making it ideal for compact storage areas.

Q: What is the difference between a container handler and a reach stacker?

A: The main difference lies in their stacking abilities. A container handler typically works in one row at a time, while a reach stacker can stack containers in multiple rows, increasing storage capacity and density.

Q: Which one is better for tight spaces, a reach stacker or a container handler?

A: While a reach stacker offers higher stacking capability, a container handler is more suitable for tight spaces due to its ability to work in narrower aisles and its greater selectivity for fast container access.